Bio
Julia Nasiek is an Associate in DarrowEverett’s Private Client Group, where she handles all aspects of divorce, probate and fiduciary litigation, and municipal and civil matters. Julia’s practice spans a wide range of high-net-worth divorce and probate disputes, including those involving complex issues such as child custody, alimony, will contests, and beneficiary disputes. Known for her steady presence and compassionate approach, Julia provides clients with the reassurance and guidance they need during some of life’s most difficult transitions, prioritizing her clients’ well-being as they navigate these challenging issues. She listens carefully to their goals, offering thoughtful, strategic advice to help them move forward with confidence. At the same time, Julia is a resolute and persuasive advocate, unafraid to stand firm to protect her clients’ interests. This balance of empathy and tenacity allows her to deliver both the comfort clients seek and the results they deserve.
Prior Experience
Before joining the DarrowEverett team, Julia spent time working for a highly regarded Boston-based law firm, where she handled an assorted caseload ranging from civil disputes advocating for sexual abuse victims to complex divorce and custody disputes. Julia also has experience as a law clerk at the same firm, where she assisted clients with complex financial issues, both personal and business-related. She also worked extensively with victims of sexual abuse and their families, supporting them in litigation against institutions such as schools, coaches, and employers.
Accolades
- The Best Lawyers in America© Ones to Watch (2026)
- Super Lawyers — Rising Stars, 2025 (Family Law)
Practice Areas
Bar Admissions
- Rhode Island
- Massachusetts (pending)
Education
- Suffolk University Law School, J.D., cum laude
- Seton Hall University, B.A., summa cum laude
Representative Matters
- Secured an award of more than $2 million on behalf of a client that suffered abuse at the hands of leaders of the Boy Scouts of America. The award comes following BSA’s decades-long practice of covering such misconduct through an “ineligible volunteer” database that shielded the crisis from public knowledge for so long.