Balancing the Scales: Purchase Price Adjustments in M&A Transactions

In the complex world of business transactions, particularly mergers and acquisitions (M&A), purchase price adjustments are a critical concept that help ensure fairness and accuracy in the final transaction price. Purchase price adjustments are mechanisms to alter (increase or decrease) the price paid for a business after the sale is closed. These adjustments are designed to ensure that the final price accurately reflects the target company’s financial condition, whether at the time of closing or based on the occurrence of contingencies occurring post-closing.

By reconciling assets, liabilities, or other financial metrics as of the closing, or accounting for the occurrence of contingencies post-closing, purchase price adjustments protect both buyers and sellers, ensuring the transaction is fair and reflective of the target company’s true value. This Insight will explore the key types of purchase price adjustments and provide practical examples to illustrate their importance.

Key Types of Purchase Price Adjustments

The types of purchase price adjustments that this Insight will discuss are: (1) a net working capital adjustment, (2) cash and debt adjustments, (3) earnouts, and (4) indemnities. The first two are adjustments based on the financial condition of the target company at the time of closing, whereas the second two are contingent on future performance or indemnity losses.

Net Working Capital Adjustment

Net working capital (NWC) represents the difference between a target company’s current assets (such as accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and inventory) and current liabilities (such as accounts payable, unearned revenue, and accrued expenses). The NWC adjustment ensures that the buyer receives the agreed level of working capital at the closing – the NWC target.

The NWC target is a predetermined amount of working capital that a buyer and seller agree should be in place at the time of closing a business transaction. It represents a benchmark level of net working capital that reflects the typical operational needs of the target company, based on its historical financial performance. The NWC target is typically calculated during the due diligence process. It is often derived by analyzing the company’s historical NWC levels over a specific period, such as the last 12-24 months, and normalizing for any unusual or one-time events that may have caused significant fluctuations. This target aims to ensure that the business is handed over with enough working capital to maintain its operations without immediately requiring additional funding from the buyer.

The NWC adjustment process generally follows this timeline. A few days before closing, the seller will prepare an estimate of the NWC and deliver it to the buyer along with a closing balance sheet. If the estimated NWC at closing deviates from the NWC target, the purchase price is adjusted accordingly, either increasing or decreasing the price. Post-closing, generally 30-90 days after the closing, the final NWC is calculated by the buyer and delivered to the seller for review. Typically, the seller will have between 30-45 days to review and, if appliable, object to the post-closing NWC calculation. If the seller does not object, the NWC will become final; however, if the seller does object, there is generally a dispute mechanism provision built into the transactional agreement (such as arbitration, decision by an independent accountant, etc.).

For illustrative purposes, presume the agreed-upon NWC target is $500,000 and at the closing, the actual NWC is $450,000, $50,000 below the NWC target. The purchase price would be adjusted downward by $50,000 to compensate the buyer for the shortfall. Conversely, if the actual NWC is $550,000, the purchase price would increase by $50,000 to reflect the excess working capital.

Net working capital adjustments protect buyers from unexpected changes in the target company’s liquidity and operational capability, ensuring they do not inherit a business with insufficient working capital to sustain operations.

Cash and Debt Adjustment

Most M&A transactions are structured on a debt-free and cash-free basis (DFCF), meaning the purchase price is calculated based on the assumption that the company will be delivered without any debt and with no excess cash. This adjustment accounts for the differences between the estimated and actual cash and debt levels at closing. Typically, buyers prefer this structure to avoid inheriting unexpected liabilities and to ensure they are not paying for cash that remains in the business.

For example, if a target company was expected to have $1 million in cash and $500,000 in debt at closing, but the actual figures are $900,000 in cash and $600,000 in debt, the purchase price would be adjusted. The buyer would receive a reduction in the purchase price equivalent to the $100,000 cash shortfall and the $100,000 additional debt, totaling a $200,000 adjustment.

Cash and debt adjustments ensure that buyers do not overpay for a business by inheriting unexpected liabilities or receiving less cash than anticipated. The DFCF structure clarifies that any deviations from the expected cash and debt levels will be reconciled through these adjustments, maintaining the integrity of the agreed purchase price.

Earnouts

An earnout is a contingent payment structure where a portion of the purchase price is deferred and tied to the future performance of the business being acquired. It allows the buyer to pay more for the business if it meets certain financial targets post-closing, providing a way to bridge valuation gaps between buyers and sellers.

For example, a buyer agrees to pay an additional $1 million if the company achieves $10 million in revenue within two years post-closing. If the company only reaches $9 million, the earnout is not paid, or it may be reduced proportionally. Earnouts can be structured around various financial or operational benchmarks, such as EBITDA, gross margin, or customer retention.

From a tax perspective, the structuring of an earnout is critical in determining whether the payments qualify for capital gains treatment or are treated as ordinary income. Sellers generally prefer earnout payments to be classified as part of the purchase price, making them eligible for capital gains treatment. If the earnout is tied to the seller’s continued employment, however, it may be recharacterized as wages and subject to ordinary income tax rates and payroll taxes.

Beyond tax considerations, key factors in structuring an earnout include the duration of the earnout period, the financial metrics used to determine payments, earnout protection covenants, and the degree of seller involvement post-closing. Earnouts can help align the interests of both parties, but they also introduce risks, such as disputes over financial performance calculations and changes in business operations that could affect the seller’s ability to achieve the targets.

Proper drafting of earnout provisions is essential to prevent conflicts, ensure clear definitions of performance metrics, and establish mechanisms for dispute resolution. Despite their benefits, earnouts should be carefully considered and crafted in the context of the overall transaction to balance risk and reward for both buyer and seller.

Indemnities

Indemnities are provisions where the seller compensates the buyer for specific losses or liabilities that arise after the transaction closes due to breaches of representations or warranties. These provisions serve as a critical risk allocation mechanism, ensuring that the buyer does not bear the financial burden of undisclosed or misrepresented liabilities.

One common way indemnities interact with post-closing purchase price adjustments is through representations and warranties insurance (RWI). RWI can either supplement or replace traditional indemnity structures by covering losses resulting from breaches of representations and warranties, reducing the need for large holdbacks or escrows, discussed below. However, RWI policies typically include exclusions and deductibles, meaning certain claims may still require direct indemnification from the seller.

Indemnity holdbacks and escrows are another concept used to help secure indemnity obligations. A portion of the purchase price may be placed in escrow or held back by buyer for a specified period post-closing to cover potential indemnity claims. If an indemnified loss occurs, the buyer can seek recovery from the escrowed or held back funds rather than pursuing direct claims against the seller. This provides an immediate and liquid source of funds to satisfy indemnity obligations.

Indemnities help protect a buyer from unforeseen liabilities that could negatively impact the value of the acquisition, but they can also impact the ultimate purchase price since they often result in an adjustment of the purchase price.

Conclusion

Purchase price adjustments are crucial for maintaining the integrity of a deal. They offer a mechanism to handle post-closing financial changes and ensure that both parties receive what they negotiated. For buyers, these adjustments minimize the risk of overpaying for a business. For sellers, they ensure fair compensation if the business’s value exceeds initial estimates.

Understanding and effectively negotiating purchase price adjustments is essential for any business professional involved in M&A transactions. By incorporating adjustments like net working capital, cash and debt adjustments, earnouts, and indemnities, both buyers and sellers can protect their interests and achieve a fair and balanced transaction outcome. These mechanisms not only safeguard the financial integrity of the deal but also build trust and transparency between the parties involved, laying a solid foundation for post-transaction success.

——————————————————————–

This DarrowEverett Insight should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. This Insight is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your attorney concerning any particular situation and any specific legal question you may have. Please reach out to us if you need help addressing any of the issues discussed in this Insight, or any other issues or concerns you may have relating to your business. We are ready to help guide you through these challenging times.

This Insight does not constitute written tax advice as described in 31 C.F.R. §10, et seq. and is not intended or written by us to be used and/or relied on as written tax advice for any purpose including, without limitation, the marketing of any transaction addressed herein. Any U.S. federal tax advice rendered by DarrowEverett LLP shall be conspicuously labeled as such, shall include a discussion of all relevant facts and circumstances, as well as of any representations, statements, findings, or agreements (including projections, financial forecasts, or appraisals) upon which we rely, applicable to transactions discussed therein in compliance with 31 C.F.R. §10.37, shall relate the applicable law and authorities to the facts, and shall set forth any applicable limits on the use of such advice.